)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":1000002,"name":"cron2","display_name":"Gert Doering","email":"gert@greenie.muc.de","username":"cron2"},"change_message_id":"2cff79b3a5145fc178ba4cdfb243069f2bdd308e","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"c6e72f6f_f9b169e5","updated":"2025-01-17 10:38:37.000000000","message":"I think the patch is fine, technically, but I\u0027ve spent a bit of thought on it, and want to suggest something else\n\n - in the MR_WITH_PORT case, use `\"[%s]:%d\"`\n - in the \"naked IPv6 address\" case, use `\"%s\"` only\n \n yes this is yet another extra `if()`, but my gut feeling is that it would help readability - and for parsers, it should not matter much.  If the parser expects to see a port, it will always be `[]`, so no variations.","commit_id":"f715c200d2c444bfbdd610db9bbaee96c8625725"}]}